On August 6, the US court sentenced Dr. Zhao Huajun, a Chinese scholar in the United States, to a two-year suspended sentence, and sentenced him to four and a half months in prison on the same charges. These four and a half months are the time Zhao Huajun has been detained so far. Zhao Huajun graduated from Zhejiang University in his early years. He obtained a Ph.D. in pharmacology from the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2006. After that, he worked at Zhejiang University. Since 2011, he has been a postdoctoral fellow at the Cancer Center of the Wisconsin Medical College in the United States. He took advantage of his work and stole a batch of developing cancer drugs and research materials code-named C-25. US FBI investigators found Zhao Huajun on Zhao Huajun ’s personal computer to be sent to the National Natural Science Foundation of China. Fund application. In the application, Zhao Huajun claimed that he researched and developed this kind of drug that may treat cancer, and he needed national funds to continue research in China. The United States sued Zhao Junhua for "premeditated and unauthorized theft of research materials and drugs related to C-25 anticancer drugs." Zhao Huajun reportedly admitted "stealing" in court. Many people disagree with this. They think that since Zhao Huajun, as a researcher at the Wisconsin Medical School Cancer Center, participated in the development of the C-25 cancer drug, he has his own research results and he can copy and save relevant research and development materials And bring back to China, and apply for the China Foundation to return to China to continue the research of the cancer drug. There are still many Chinese people who hold this view. In the past, many overseas returnees did. They lie about the results of foreign laboratories they studied abroad as their own research results, and used them to promote positions in China, declare funds and Science and technology awards, and repeated success, individual individuals even became academicians. It takes a lot of time for a scientific research project to be launched and implemented. You have to think first, then apply for a fund. After the fund is in place, you will organize a battle for the horses and horses. It will take several years to produce some results. Some people who do not pay much attention to the protection of intellectual property rights want to take shortcuts, without plowing fields, sowing seeds, weeding, or fertilizing, picking fruits directly, packing them away. How is there such a good thing in the world? Zhao Huajun's approach violates the taboo of strictly protecting the intellectual property rights of the national science and education circles. C-25 The intellectual property rights of cancer drugs belong to the Wisconsin Medical School Cancer Center and its research funding provider. Any doctoral student or postdoctoral researcher has no intellectual property rights. Zhao Huajun should understand this because at the beginning of the project He definitely signed an agreement on technological confidentiality and intellectual property. Not to mention low-level researchers such as doctoral students or post-doctors, even the main researchers of the project team, such as professors, do not have the right and qualification to embezzle or transfer knowledge products without permission. For example, a professor who left the Wisconsin Medical School Cancer Center to work at another university or company cannot continue to develop and research C-25 cancer drugs. Otherwise, the scientific research community will not be messed up. Who would be willing to invest in original research and development? Moreover, Zhao Huajun is not the person who plays the main role in the research process of C-25 cancer drugs. At most, he is a "wage earner" who runs around. Zhao Huajun ’s mistake is like a person working at Apple, claiming to own the intellectual property rights of Apple ’s mobile phone, stealing some of the company ’s research materials and selling it to other companies that have commercial competition with Apple. For example, before retiring, Klaus Nielsen was a senior researcher at the Institute of Food Inspection Canada. He worked with five colleagues on research and developed a 15-second detection method for Brucella in animals, which was obtained in 2003. Canadian Technology Transformation Award. However, after he retired, he cooperated with a female Chinese to open a company in Harbin, China to sell related technical products. After a thorough investigation, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Ottawa Police arrested Nelson at the Ottawa Airport in October 2012, accusing him Smuggling and selling viruses and engaging in economic espionage. Although Nelson is the main contributor to the research on Brucella in animals, he does not have intellectual property rights for the technology. The owner of the intellectual property rights is the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. . I knew that a Chinese student went to Canada to study for a Ph.D., using the trust of his supervisor to copy all the research data in the database established in the laboratory for many years back to China, claiming to be his "results" and being funded by his own domestic fund project. The results of the research have forgotten the intellectual property agreement signed with the university in Canada that year. In fact, this is a serious academic misconduct. The author Ji Shaocheng is a professor at the Montreal School of Engineering in Canada Silicone Kitchen Utensils,Silicone Cooking Utensils,Silicone Kitchen Utensils Set,Silicone Kitchen Tools Xiongyang Household Co., Ltd , https://www.nbyjkitchen-manage.com